Paul Henderson
- Solicitor
Thanks to sayings such as “possession is nine tenths of the law” it is perhaps not surprising that a lot of people might assume that occupation of land automatically confers rights of ownership. But is it really that simple?
Unsurprisingly, and perhaps fortunately, it isn’t so straightforward – such a scenario would arguably result in a stream of speculative and contested claims. A statutory framework exists to prevent this and to ensure that any land which is to be acquired in absence of title goes through a robust set of checks to identify a potential owner.
Ownerless property is transferred through a deed called an a non domino disposition. This allows a party to grant a right to land without having the title to do so. It is not possible for this to be granted by the applicant in its own favour (unless acting under different capacities), and in most cases it must be transferred by another party.
Peaceful, continuous and uninterrupted ownership of the property for at least one year is required by either:
This can be evidenced through affidavits, photographic evidence or any supplementary documentation which can be attributed towards occupation. It should be noted however, that this initial year of possession isn’t factored into the prescriptive period required to acquire ownership.
The applicant must show that they have taken all reasonable measures to locate and contact the potential owner. There is a hierarchical structure which must be followed:
Attempts must be made to contact the owner of the land. If the property is registered, a title sheet will be available. If unregistered, then the applicant will need to show that they have tried to trace the owner (via property searches or copy deeds). If a proprietor is identifiable, whether they are still capable of ownership must be determined, as an individual could be deceased, or a company could be dissolved.
If the proprietor cannot be identified or traced, then supporting evidence showing this conclusion must be exhibited. In certain cases, it may still be possible for title to be “completed”. For example, the property may have transferred to a beneficiary under a will and confirmation from the estate could be used to acquire ownership.
If all routes of enquiry are exhausted, then this again must be evidenced. In such a scenario, the Crown, represented by the King’s and Lord Treasurer’s Remembrancer, should be notified as the ultimus haeres (the ultimate heir) under Scots Law.
On receipt of an application, the Keeper of the Registers of Scotland is bound to make a notification as an anti-fraud measure. If satisfied that the correct party has been notified, the Keeper will re-notify those already contacted by the applicant. If the Keeper believes a different person should have been contacted, the application will be rejected.
If an objection to a claim is received within 60 days in response to an applicant’s notification it will be rejected.
The same also applies in relation to the Keeper’s notification.
An applicant must ensure certain information is provided when making their notification. This includes, but is not limited to:
If an application is accepted without any objections, then the resulting title sheet will be marked as “provisional”. This is because ownership is conditional on possession being enjoyed openly, peacefully and without judicial interruption for 10 years.
Once this prescriptive period lapses, title to the property shall be exempt from challenge and the applicant will become the legal owner. Steps should then be taken to notify the Keeper and submit appropriate evidence to facilitate the removal of the provisional marking from the title sheet.
If you are looking to determine ownership rights, or have any other questions relating to rural land and property law, contact Paul Henderson for advice on your individual situation.
You may also be interested in the following articles: