- 9 July 2018
Insight Hub
Stay up to date with our latest insights.
- 29 May 2018
Court clarifies the scope of damages in ‘wrongful birth’ actions
A recent English High Court decision has helped clarify the scope of damages which could be recoverable in the case of so-called ‘wrongful birth’ actions.
Learn more- 9 October 2017
Medical negligence and birth injury cases – causation issues
Medical negligence cases involving injuries at birth can present difficulty for pursuers when attempting to prove the facts.
Learn more- 24 July 2017
Professional disciplinary appeal sets out lessons for registrants and regulators
The potentially serious consequences for registrants of a failure to attend disciplinary proceedings was confirmed in the recent appeal of Sanusi v General Medical Council [2018] EWHC 1388 (Admin).
Learn more- 29 May 2017
Court rejects attempt to seek amendment of a medical negligence case after the timebar
The Court of Session has ruled that a Minute of Amendment which would have introduced a new case into a medical negligence action when the triennium for the new allegations had already passed is not to be allowed.
Learn more- 15 December 2016
Letters from regulators should clearly warn registrants of potential outcomes
The Court of Session has upheld the appeal of a nurse, LM, against a decision of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) to strike her off from the NMC register in her absence, saying that the powers of the committee had been ‘buried in the text’ of the notice of hearing letter.
Learn more- 22 July 2016
Buying a house together – what unmarried couples need to know
Although home is where the heart is, for many unmarried couples buying a house together, the conversation about where to buy, what they can afford and the colour to paint the living room wall is difficult enough.
Learn more- 13 April 2015
Consent – the impact of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board
In March 2015 the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the field of medical negligence relevant to the issue of consent. The legal consequence of this case is that the paradigm is said to have shifted to a more patient focussed approach to the question of whether consent has been obtained.
Learn more